additions

main.bib

@@ -9011,6 +9011,33 @@
   keywords  = {wao, phonology},
 }
 
+@Article{Lewis1970,
+  author       = {Lewis, David},
+  date         = {1970},
+  journaltitle = {Synthese},
+  title        = {General Semantics},
+  pages        = {18-67},
+  volume       = {22},
+  file         = {:/home/noah/Documents/reading/semantics/lewis1970general.pdf:PDF},
+  keywords     = {semantics, syntax},
+}
+
+@Article{Grosz2014,
+  author       = {Grosz, Patrick G. and Patel-Grosz, Pritty and Fedorenko, Evelina and Gibson, Edward},
+  date         = {2015},
+  journaltitle = {Journal of Semantics},
+  title        = {Constraints on donkey pronouns},
+  doi          = {10.1093/jos/ffu009},
+  eprint       = {https://academic.oup.com/jos/article-pdf/32/4/619/6988220/ffu009.pdf},
+  issn         = {0167-5133},
+  number       = {4},
+  pages        = {619-648},
+  url          = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffu009},
+  volume       = {32},
+  abstract     = {This article reports on an experimental study of donkey pronouns , pronouns (e.g. it ) whose meaning covaries with that of a non-pronominal noun phrase (e.g. a donkey ) even though they are not in a structural relationship that is suitable for quantifier-variable binding. We investigate three constraints, (i) the preference for the presence of an overt NP antecedent that is not part of another word, (ii) the salience of the position of an antecedent that is part of another word, and (iii) the uniqueness of an intended antecedent (in terms of world knowledge). We compare constructions in which intended antecedents occur in a context such as who owns an N / who is an N-owner with constructions of the type who was without an N / who was N-less . Our findings corroborate the existence of the overt NP antecedent constraint, and also show that the salience of an unsuitable antecedent’s position matters. Furthermore, our findings show that uniqueness only matters in the N-less type construction and not in the N-owner type construction; we conclude that this supports a potential approach in terms of dynamic semantics over a competing e-type approach.},
+  keywords     = {psycholing, semantics},
+}
+
 @Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:biblatex;}
 
 @Comment{jabref-meta: grouping: