bibliographies/psycholinguistics.bib

617 lines
24 KiB
BibTeX
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

@article{alemanBanon201249,
title = "The processing of number and gender agreement in
Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of
the effects of structural distance ",
journal = "Brain Research ",
volume = 1456,
number = 0,
pages = "49 - 63",
year = 2012,
issn = "0006-8993",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.057",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899312005914",
author = "José Alemán Bañón and Robert Fiorentino and Alison
Gabriele",
keywords = "\{ERP\}",
keywords = "\{P600\} amplitude",
keywords = "Structural distance",
keywords = "Linear distance",
keywords = "Agreement",
keywords = "Spanish ",
abstract = "Previous research suggests that the processing of
agreement is affected by the distance between the
agreeing elements. However, the unique contribution
of structural distance (number of intervening
syntactic phrases) to the processing of agreement
remains an open question, since previous
investigations do not tease apart structural and
linear distance (number of intervening words). We
used event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine the
extent to which structural distance impacts the
processing of Spanish number and gender
agreement. Violations were realized both within the
phrase and across the phrase. Across both levels of
structural distance, linear distance was kept
constant, as was the syntactic category of the
agreeing elements. Number and gender agreement
violations elicited a robust \{P600\} between 400
and 900ms, a component associated with
morphosyntactic processing. No amplitude differences
were observed between number and gender violations,
suggesting that the two features are processed
similarly at the brain level. Within-phrase
agreement yielded more positive waveforms than
across-phrase agreement, both for agreement
violations and for grammatical sentences (no
agreement by distance interaction). These effects
can be interpreted as evidence that structural
distance impacts the establishment of agreement
overall, consistent with sentence processing models
which predict that hierarchical structure impacts
the processing of syntactic dependencies. However,
due to the lack of an agreement by distance
interaction, the possibility cannot be ruled out
that these effects are driven by differences in
syntactic predictability between the within-phrase
and across-phrase configurations, notably the fact
that the syntactic category of the critical word was
more predictable in the within-phrase conditions. "
}
@Article{almor1999noun,
pages = {748--765},
number = {4},
volume = {106},
year = {1999},
journaltitle = {Psychological Review},
subtitle = {The information load hypothesis},
title = {Noun-phrase anaphora and focus},
author = {Almor, Amit}
}
@article{almor2008focus,
title = {Focus and noun phrase anaphors in spoken language
comprehension},
author = {Almor, Amit and Eimas, Peter D},
journal = {Language and cognitive processes},
volume = 23,
number = 2,
pages = {201--225},
year = 2008,
publisher = {Taylor \& Francis}
}
@article{barber2005grammatical,
title = {Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish:
An ERP comparison},
author = {Barber, Horacio and Carreiras, Manuel},
journal = {Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience},
volume = 17,
number = 1,
pages = {137--153},
year = 2005,
publisher = {MIT Press}
}
@article{biran20121103,
title = "The representation of lexical-syntactic information:
Evidence from syntactic and lexical retrieval
impairments in aphasia",
journal = "Cortex ",
volume = 48,
number = 9,
pages = "1103 - 1127",
year = 2012,
issn = "0010-9452",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.024",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945211001687",
author = "Michal Biran and Naama Friedmann",
keywords = "Aphasia",
keywords = "Predicate argument structure (PAS)",
keywords = "Grammatical gender",
keywords = "Hebrew",
keywords = "Syntactic lexicon ",
abstract = {This study explored lexical-syntactic information syntactic
information that is stored in the lexicon and its
relation to syntactic and lexical impairments in
aphasia. We focused on two types of
lexical-syntactic information: predicate argument
structure (PAS) of verbs (the number and types of
arguments the verb selects) and grammatical gender
of nouns. The participants were 17 Hebrew-speaking
individuals with aphasia who had a syntactic deficit
(agrammatism) or a lexical retrieval deficit
(anomia) located at the semantic lexicon, the
phonological output lexicon, or the phonological
output buffer. After testing the participants
syntactic and lexical retrieval abilities and
establishing the functional loci of their deficits,
we assessed their \{PAS\} and grammatical gender
knowledge. This assessment included sentence
completion, sentence production, sentence
repetition, and grammaticality judgment tasks. The
participants performance on these tests yielded
several important dissociations. Three agrammatic
participants had impaired syntax but unimpaired
\{PAS\} knowledge. Three agrammatic participants had
impaired syntax but unimpaired grammatical gender
knowledge. This indicates that lexical-syntactic
information is represented separately from syntax,
and can be spared even when syntax at the sentence
level, such as embedding and movement are
impaired. All 5 individuals with phonological output
buffer impairment and all 3 individuals with
phonological output lexicon impairment had preserved
lexical-syntactic knowledge. These selective
impairments indicate that lexical-syntactic
information is represented at a lexical stage prior
to the phonological lexicon and the phonological
buffer. Three participants with impaired \{PAS\}
(aPASia) and impaired grammatical gender who showed
intact lexical-semantic knowledge indicate that the
lexical-syntactic information is represented
separately from the semantic lexicon. This led us to
conclude that lexical-syntactic information is
stored in a separate syntactic lexicon. A double
dissociation between \{PAS\} and grammatical gender
impairments indicated that different types of
lexical-syntactic information are represented
separately in this syntactic lexicon.}
}
@Article{botvinick2004doing,
doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.395},
pages = {395--429},
number = {2},
volume = {111},
year = {2004},
journal = {Psychological Review},
subtitle = {A Recurrent Connectionist Approach to Normal and Impaired Routine Sequential Action},
title = {Doing Without Schema Hierarchies},
author = {Botvinick, Matthew and Plaut, David C}
}
@Article{braitenberg1997detection,
keywords = {finite automata},
file = {Documents/reading/psycholinguistics/braitenberg1997detection.pdf},
pages = {229-277},
volume = {20},
year = {1997},
journaltitle = {Behavioral and Brain Sciences},
title = {The detection and generation of sequeunces as a key to cerebellar function: Experiments and theory},
author = {Braitenberg, Valentino and Heck, Detlef and Sultan, Fahad}
}
@Book{braitenberg2013anatomy,
keywords = {finite automata},
publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media},
number = {18},
series = {Studies of Brain Function},
year = {2013},
title = {Anatomy of the Cortex: Statistics and Geometry},
author = {Braitenberg, Valentino and Schüz, Almut}
}
@Article{caramazza1998domain,
pages = {1--34},
number = {1},
volume = {10},
year = {1998},
subtitle = {The animate-inanimate distinction},
journaltitle = {Journal of cognitive neuroscience},
title = {Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain},
author = {Caramazza, Alfonso and Shelton, Jennifer R.}
}
@article{chan2011decoding,
title = {Decoding word and category-specific spatiotemporal
representations from MEG and EEG},
author = {Chan, Alexander M and Halgren, Eric and Marinkovic,
Ksenija and Cash, Sydney S},
journal = {Neuroimage},
volume = 54,
number = 4,
pages = {3028--3039},
year = 2011,
publisher = {Elsevier}
}
@article{chan2011first,
title = {First-pass selectivity for semantic categories in human anteroventral temporal lobe},
author = {Chan, Alexander M and Baker, Janet M and Eskandar,
Emad and Schomer, Donald and Ulbert, Istvan and
Marinkovic, Ksenija and Cash, Sydney S and Halgren,
Eric},
journal = {The Journal of Neuroscience},
volume = 31,
number = 49,
pages = {18119--18129},
year = 2011,
publisher = {Soc Neuroscience}
}
@article{chen2013task,
title = {Task modulation of brain responses in visual word
recognition as studied using EEG/MEG and fMRI},
author = {Chen, Yuanyuan and Davis, Matthew H and
Pulverm{\"u}ller, Friedemann and Hauk, Olaf},
journal = {Frontiers in human neuroscience},
volume = 7,
year = 2013,
publisher = {Frontiers Media SA}
}
@article{cooper2006hierarchical,
title = {Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of
sequential behavior.},
journal = {Psychological Review},
volume = 113,
number = 4,
pages = {887--916},
author = {Cooper, Richard P and Shallice, Tim},
year = 2006,
publisher = {American Psychological Association}
}
@Article{cronbach1955psychological,
file = {Documents/reading/psychology/cronbach1955psychological.pdf},
pages = {281--302},
number = {4},
volume = {52},
year = {1955},
journaltitle = {Psychological Bulletin},
title = {Construct validity in psychological tests},
author = {Cronbach, Lee and Meehl, Paul}
}
@Article{cronbach1957two,
pages = {671--684},
volume = {12},
year = {1957},
journaltitle = {American Psychologist},
title = {The two disciplines of scientific psychology},
author = {Cronbach, Lee}
}
@Article{diesendruck2001childrens,
pages = {630--641},
number = {5},
volume = {37},
year = {2001},
journaltitle = {Developmental Psychology},
subtitle = {A pragmatic account},
title = {Children's avoidance of lexical overlap},
author = {Diesendruck, Gil and Markson, Lori}
}
@article{dikker2013predicting,
title = {Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical
preactivation},
author = {Dikker, Suzanne and Pylkk{\"a}nen, Liina},
journal = {Brain and language},
volume = 127,
number = 1,
pages = {55--64},
year = 2013,
publisher = {Elsevier}
}
@inproceedings{fyshe2012decoding,
title = {Decoding Word Semantics from Magnetoencephalography
Time Series Transformations},
author = {Fyshe, Alona and Sudre, Gustavo and Wehbe, Leila and
Murphy, Brian and Mitchell, Tom},
booktitle = {2nd NIPS Workshop on Machine Learning and
Interpretation in NeuroImaging (MLINI)},
year = 2012
}
@Article{hudson2009getting,
pages = {30--66},
volume = {59},
year = {2009},
journaltitle = {Cognitive Psychology},
subtitle = {When learners change languages},
title = {Getting it right by getting it wrong},
author = {Hudson Kam, Carla L. and Newport, Elissa L.}
}
@article{huth20121210,
title = "A Continuous Semantic Space Describes the
Representation of Thousands of Object and Action
Categories across the Human Brain ",
journal = "Neuron ",
volume = 76,
number = 6,
pages = "1210 - 1224",
year = 2012,
issn = "0896-6273",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.014",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627312009348",
author = "Alexander G. Huth and Shinji Nishimoto and An T. Vu
and Jack L. Gallant",
abstract = "Summary Humans can see and name thousands of
distinct object and action categories, so it is
unlikely that each category is represented in a
distinct brain area. A more efficient scheme would
be to represent categories as locations in a
continuous semantic space mapped smoothly across the
cortical surface. To search for such a space, we
used fMRI to measure human brain activity evoked by
natural movies. We then used voxelwise models to
examine the cortical representation of 1,705 object
and action categories. The first few dimensions of
the underlying semantic space were recovered from
the fit models by principal components
analysis. Projection of the recovered semantic space
onto cortical flat maps shows that semantic
selectivity is organized into smooth gradients that
cover much of visual and nonvisual
cortex. Furthermore, both the recovered semantic
space and the cortical organization of the space are
shared across different individuals. Video Abstract
"
}
@Article{james2018individual,
pages = {155--181},
volume = {102},
year = {2018},
journaltitle = {Journal of Memory and Language},
subtitle = {Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?},
title = {Individual differences in syntactic processing},
author = {James, Ariel N and Fraundorf, Scott H and Lee, Eun-Kyung and Watson, Duane G}
}
@article{kaiser2004role,
title = {The role of discourse context in the processing of a
flexible word-order language},
author = {Kaiser, Elsi and Trueswell, John C},
journal = {Cognition},
volume = 94,
number = 2,
pages = {113--147},
year = 2004,
publisher = {Elsevier}
}
@Article{kalashnikova2018acceptance,
pages = {1517--1530},
number = {6},
volume = {23},
year = {2018},
journaltitle = {International Journal of Bilingualism},
title = {Acceptance of lexical overlap by monolingual and bilingual toddlers},
author = {Kalashnikova, Marina and Oliveri, Aimee and Mattock, Karen}
}
@Article{laine1998lexical,
pages = {220--229},
number = {3},
volume = {61},
year = {1998},
journaltitle = {Psychological Research},
title = {Lexical access to inflected words as measured by lateralized visual lexical decision},
author = {Laine, Matti}
}
@incollection{lashley1951problem,
title = {The problem of serial order in behavior},
author = {Lashley, Karl Spencer},
booktitle = {Cerebral mechanisms in behavior},
pages = {112--136},
year = 1951
}
@article{leonard2014specific,
title = {Specific language impairment across languages},
author = {Leonard, Laurence B},
journal = {Child development perspectives},
volume = 8,
number = 1,
pages = {1--5},
year = 2014,
publisher = {Wiley Online Library}
}
@article{levelt1998meg,
title = {An MEG study of picture naming},
author = {Levelt, Willem JM and Praamstra, Peter and Meyer,
Antje S and Helenius, P{\"a}ivi and Salmelin,
Riitta},
journal = {Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience},
volume = 10,
number = 5,
pages = {553--567},
year = 1998,
publisher = {MIT Press}
}
@Article{markman1988childrens,
pages = {121--157},
number = {2},
volume = {20},
year = {1988},
journaltitle = {Cognitive Psychology},
title = {Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words},
author = {Markman, Ellen M. and Wachtel, Gwyn F.}
}
@Article{maye2008weckud,
pages = {548--561},
number = {3},
volume = {32},
year = {2008},
journaltitle = {Cognitive Science},
subtitle = {Lexical adaptation to novel accent},
title = {The {W}eckud {W}etch of the {W}ast},
author = {Maye, Jessica and Aslin, Richard N. and Tanenhaus, Michael K.}
}
@Article{meyer1971facilitation,
pages = {227--234},
number = {2},
volume = {90},
year = {1971},
journaltitle = {Journal of Experimental Psychology},
subtitle = {Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations},
title = {Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words},
author = {Meyer, David E. and Schvaneveldt, Roger W.}
}
@article{orourke201162,
title = "Morphological agreement at a distance: Dissociation
between early and late components of the
event-related brain potential ",
journal = "Brain Research ",
volume = 1392,
number = 0,
pages = "62 - 79",
year = 2011,
issn = "0006-8993",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.03.071",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899311006664",
author = "Polly L. O'Rourke and Cyma Van Petten",
keywords = "Event-related potential",
keywords = "Gender agreement",
keywords = "Number agreement",
keywords = "Morphology",
keywords = "Sentence",
keywords = "Proficiency ",
abstract = "Syntactic relationships among non-adjacent words are
a core aspect of sentence structure. Research on
complex sentences with displaced elements has
concluded that resolving long-distance dependencies
can tax working memory. Here we examine a simpler
relationship—morphological agreement between the
elements of a noun phrase—across a gradient of
distance. Participants read sentences with
violations of gender agreement among Spanish nouns,
determiners and adjectives. For those explicitly
assigned the task of detecting errors, accuracy was
uniformly high across the four levels of distance
between (dis)agreeing words. A second group
performed a comprehension task as \{ERPs\} were
recorded. Gender agreement errors elicited a left
anterior negativity (LAN) regardless of the distance
between (dis)agreeing words, indicating that the
errors were detected. In contrast, a temporally
later component of the \{ERP\} (P600) showed
decreasing amplitudes as the number of words between
(dis)agreeing elements increased. Smaller \{P600\}
responses were also associated with slower responses
to the comprehension questions. Given other work
suggesting that the \{P600\} indexes attempted
repair of a problematic sentence structure, the
results suggest that the participants became
increasingly unwilling to re-visit their initial
parse of a sentence as the required effort
increased, despite having noted an error. The
results are discussed within the context of studies
showing that readers often compute inadequate
structural representations of sentences. We suggest
that \{P600\} amplitude may reflect the costs versus
benefits of sentence re-analysis, determined by a
combination of sentence structure, task
requirements, and the degree to which sentence
meaning hinges on a correct structural analysis. "
}
@Article{shoji2017repeated,
file = {Documents/reading/psycholinguistics/shoji2017repeated.pdf},
doi = {10.1007/s10936-016-9424-4},
pages = {89--106},
volume = {46},
year = {2017},
journaltitle = {Journal of Psycholinguistic Research},
title = {The repeated name penalty, the overt pronoun penalty, and topic in {J}apanese},
author = {Shoji, Shinichi and Dubinsky, Stanley and Almor, Amit}
}
@Article{singh2016accommodating,
pages = {607-634},
volume = {40},
year = {2016},
journaltitle = {Cognitive Science},
title = {Accommodating presuppositions is inappropriate in implausible contexts},
author = {Singh, Raj and Fedorenko, Evelina and Mahowald, Kyle and Gibson, Edward}
}
@article{sudre2012451,
title = "Tracking neural coding of perceptual and semantic
features of concrete nouns ",
journal = "NeuroImage ",
volume = 62,
number = 1,
pages = "451 - 463",
year = 2012,
issn = "1053-8119",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.048",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811912004442",
author = "Gustavo Sudre and Dean Pomerleau and Mark Palatucci
and Leila Wehbe and Alona Fyshe and Riitta Salmelin
and Tom Mitchell",
keywords = "Knowledge representation",
keywords = "Semantics",
keywords = "Language comprehension",
keywords = "Magnetoencephalography ",
abstract = "We present a methodological approach employing
magnetoencephalography (MEG) and machine learning
techniques to investigate the flow of perceptual and
semantic information decodable from neural activity
in the half second during which the brain
comprehends the meaning of a concrete
noun. Important information about the cortical
location of neural activity related to the
representation of nouns in the human brain has been
revealed by past studies using fMRI. However, the
temporal sequence of processing from sensory input
to concept comprehension remains unclear, in part
because of the poor time resolution provided by
fMRI. In this study, subjects answered 20 questions
(e.g. is it alive?) about the properties of 60
different nouns prompted by simultaneous
presentation of a pictured item and its written
name. Our results show that the neural activity
observed with \{MEG\} encodes a variety of
perceptual and semantic features of stimuli at
different times relative to stimulus onset, and in
different cortical locations. By decoding these
features, our MEG-based classifier was able to
reliably distinguish between two different concrete
nouns that it had never seen before. The results
demonstrate that there are clear differences between
the time course of the magnitude of \{MEG\} activity
and that of decodable semantic
information. Perceptual features were decoded from
\{MEG\} activity earlier in time than semantic
features, and features related to animacy, size, and
manipulability were decoded consistently across
subjects. We also observed that regions commonly
associated with semantic processing in the fMRI
literature may not show high decoding results in
MEG. We believe that this type of approach and the
accompanying machine learning methods can form the
basis for further modeling of the flow of neural
information during language processing and a variety
of other cognitive processes. "
}
@Article{tamminen2013novel,
number = {5},
volume = {66},
year = {2013},
journaltitle = {Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
subtitle = {Evidence from unmasked and masked semantic priming},
title = {Novel word integration in the mental lexicon},
author = {Tamminen, Jakke and Gaskell, M. Gareth}
}
@Comment{
Local Variables:
bibtex-dialect: biblatex
End:
}