\newabbreviation{wt}{WT}{changeme} \newabbreviation{dso}{DSO}{data structure oriented} \newabbreviation{lp}{LP}{Lexical Proof Morphology} \newabbreviation{ero}{ERO}{Pāṇinian (or elsewhere) rule ordering} \newabbreviation{le}{LEI}{lexical entry interface} \newabbreviation{stc}{STC}{Separationist Taxonomy-Based Constructive Proof Morphology} \newabbreviation{gpsg}{GPSG}{Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar} \newabbreviation{cg}{CG}{categorial grammar} \newabbreviation{ccg}{CCG}{Combinatory Categorial Grammar} \newabbreviation{lcg}{LCG}{Linear Categorial Grammar} \newabbreviation{dycg}{DyCG}{Dynamic Categorial Grammar} \newabbreviation{coc}{CiC}{Calculus of Inductive Constructions} \newabbreviation{hol}{HOL}{Higher Order Logic} \newabbreviation{ibm}{IbM}{Information-Based Morphology} \newabbreviation{pfm}{PFM}{Paradigm Function Morphology} \newabbreviation{plt}{PLT}{Paradigm Linking Theory} \newabbreviation{ia}{IA}{Item and Arrangement} \newabbreviation{ip}{IP}{Item and Process} \newabbreviation{nm}{NM}{Network Morphology} \newabbreviation{dm}{DM}{Distributed Morphology} \newabbreviation{hpsg}{HPSG}{Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar} \newabbreviation{hsm}{HSM}{hierarchical finite-state machine} \newabbreviation{htlcg}{HTLCG}{Hybrid Type-Logical Grammar} \newabbreviation{avm}{AVM}{attribute value matrix} \newabbreviation{com}{CoM}{Construction Morphology} \newabbreviation{cam}{CaM}{Canonical Morphology} \newabbreviation{wp}{WP}{Word and Paradigm} \newabbreviation{ug}{UG}{Universal Grammar} \newabbreviation{gl}{GL}{Generative Lexicon} \newabbreviation{cl}{CL}{Cognitive Linguistics} \newabbreviation{sil}{SIL}{Summer Institute of Linguistics} %% Found in Leipzig \newglossaryentry{clf:l}{type=ling, name={\lx{clf}}, description={Classifier: Classifiers in Wao Terero are lexical suffixes that play a classifier role.}} \newglossaryentry{decl:l}{type=ling, name={\lx{decl}}, description={Declarative: The suffix \wf{-pa} in Wao Terero is placed on the main verb of a declarative sentence.}} \newglossaryentry{loc:l}{type=ling, name={\lx{loc}}, description={Locative: The suffix \wf{-de} in Wao Terero functions as a locative when placed on nominals.}} \newglossaryentry{inf:l}{type=ling, name={\lx{inf}}, description={Infinitive: The suffix \wf{-kĩ} in Wao Terero may not be an infinitive but Wao speakers translate the Spanish infinitive to verbal forms that end in \wf{-kĩ}.}} \newglossaryentry{purp:l}{type=ling, name={\lx{purp}}, description={Purposive: The suffix \wf{-ketãte} on a subordinate verb indicates an aim or purpose of the main verb action.}} \newglossaryentry{1.pl:l}{type=ling, name={1.\lx{pl}}, description={First Person Plural (Exclusive): The suffix \wf{-bõdi} is plural and appropriate for exclusive usage.}} %% Not Found in Leipzig \newglossaryentry{ls:l}{type=ling, name={\lx{ls}}, description={* Lexical Suffix: Lexical suffixes are suffixes with lexical meanings.}} \newglossaryentry{ger:l}{type=ling, name={\lx{ger}}, description={* Gerundial: Called the gerundial since at least \citet{Peeke1968}, the suffix \wf{-te} provides an adverb-like status to a verbal phrase. It is also used in constructions that indicate that a sentient being is a direct or indirect object.}} \newglossaryentry{desi:l}{type=ling, name={\lx{desi}}, description={* Desiderative: \wf{edẽ} ...}} %% Lexical Suffix Labels \newglossaryentry{plant:l}{type=ling, name={.plant}, description={* The lexical suffix \wf{wẽ}.}} \newglossaryentry{cloth:l}{type=ling, name={.cloth}, description={* The lexical suffix \wf{kō}.}} \newglossaryentry{leaf:l}{type=ling, name={.leaf}, description={* The lexical suffix \wf{yabo}.}} \newglossaryentry{canoe:l}{type=ling, name={.canoe}, description={* The lexical suffix \wf{po}.}} \newglossaryentry{shell:l}{type=ling, name={.shell}, description={* The lexical suffix \wf{ta}.}} \newglossaryentry{stone:l}{type=ling, name={.stone}, description={* The lexical suffix \wf{ka}.}} \newglossaryentry{liquid:l}{type=ling, name={.liquid}, description={* The lexical suffix \wf{pẽ} (pre-merge \phm{pæ̃}).}} \newglossaryentry{arm:l}{type=ling, name={.arm}, description={* The lexical suffix \wf{bẽ} (pre-merge \phm{bæ̃}).}} \newglossaryentry{cord:l}{type=ling, name={.cord}, description={* The lexical suffix \wf{mẽ} (pre-merge \phm{bẽ}).}} %% Terms Used in the Theory \newglossaryentry{fentry}{name={form paradigm entry}, description={add me}} \newglossaryentry{mcat}{name={morphological category}, description={TODO add description}} \newglossaryentry{mform}{name={morphological form}, description={TODO add description}} \newglossaryentry{pani}{name={Pāṇinian}, description={Pāṇinian}} \newglossaryentry{morph}{name={morph}, description={% A morph could be thought of as the form component of a morpheme without a sememe or meaning. It is not an exponent because it does not realize a meaning. It is a unit of phonology that within the context of a word-form contributes to the interpretation of the word-form's possible meanings. }} \newglossaryentry{form}{name={form}, description={% A form is essentially a phonological form. More precisely, here it is an abstraction with an interpretation within an unknown theory of phonology. For instance, if `a' is a symbol used in a form, this may be interpreted as a phoneme. It may be the case that morphophonology is captured in the notation such that `s' could be used for the English plural/genitive/third person morph, which is predictably [s], [z] or [ɪz]. This theory is non-committal as to the ontological status of what these symbols represent but one should refer to \citet{hockett1954two}, where these are seen as notations for the purposes of concise description, rather than notations for underlying forms in a mental grammar. In particular, these should not be seen as an endorsement of the underlying form concept. }} \newglossaryentry{wordform}{name={word-form}, description={% A word-form is a form that corresponds to a freely occurring syntactic element. Note that this remains an informal descriptive term. }} \newglossaryentry{allomorphy}{name={allomorphy}, description={% The general term given to the phenomenon where two lexemes are in overlapping syntactic distributions but exhibit complementary distributed phonological characteristics in some of their forms.}} \newglossaryentry{equivalence class}{name={equivalence classes}, description={}} \newglossaryentry{inflection class}{name={inflection class}, description={% Traditionally, these correspond to conjugations or declensions.}} \newglossaryentry{separationist}{name={separationist}, description={% A theory of morphology that involves multiple layers of paradigms.}} \newglossaryentry{stem}{name={stem}, description={% A stem is any form which can serve as the input to a morphological process.}} \newglossaryentry{realizational}{name={realizational}, description={% A theory of morphology that seeks to find correspondences between morphological forms and morphosyntactic features.}} \newglossaryentry{tectogrammar}{name={tectogrammar}, description={% to be added}} \newglossaryentry{phenogrammar}{name={phenogrammar}, description={% to be added}} \newglossaryentry{constructivist}{name={constructivist}, description={% to be added}} \newglossaryentry{abstractivist}{name={abstractivist}, description={% to be added}} \newglossaryentry{exponent}{name={exponent}, description={% to be added}} \newglossaryentry{lexeme}{name={lexeme}, description={% A lexeme is an atomic term used as a key to morphomic classes in morphomi entries and a unique semantic contribution to a pattern in a sign paradigm entry.}} \newglossaryentry{morphomicparadigm}{name={morphomic paradigm}, description={% A morphomic paradigm is a subset of morphomic entries such that for a given lexeme all the morphomic entries contain that lexeme. $\exists x:Lexem\forall y:MEntry.\pi_2 y = x$}} \newglossaryentry{morphomicentry}{name={morphomic entry}, plural={morphomic entries}, description={% A morphomic entry is a triple of a morphome, a lexeme and a morphopheno term. $MEntry =_{def} Morphome\times Lexeme\times MPheno$}} \newglossaryentry{morphomehierarchy}{name={morphome hierarchy}, plural={morphome hierarchies}, description={% A morphome hierarchy is a order over morphomes. The order is stipulated axiomatically.}} \newglossaryentry{morphome}{name={morphome}, description={% A morphome is a category of morphs and larger forms composed of morphs. Each morph has a morphome category and each composition of a morph with a morph has a morphome category. Morphomes may also categorize groups of other morphomes according to the morphome hierarchy. A morphome is represented as a set of morphome names. $Morphome =_{def} Ensemble MName$\footnote{I am borrowing the Coq Standard Library name for a set-like type so as not to confuse it with Set, the predicative type universe.}}} \newglossaryentry{morphomename}{name={morphome name}, description={% A morphome name is an element of a morphome and serves to designate and distinguish one morphome from another.}} \newglossaryentry{signparadigm}{name={sign paradigm}, description={}} \newglossaryentry{sign}{name={sign}, description={}} \newglossaryentry{formclass}{name={form class}, plural={form classes}, description={}} \newglossaryentry{form-form}{name={form-form mapping}, description={}} \newglossaryentry{form-sign}{name={form-sign mapping}, description={}} \newglossaryentry{fparadigm}{name={form paradigm}, description={}} \newglossaryentry{classhierarchy}{name={class hierarchy}, description={}} \newglossaryentry{pch}{name={state class hierarchy}, description={% A state class hierarchy is an order on states.}} \newglossaryentry{mentrys}{name={morphological entry set}, description={% A morphological entry set contains the base entries and any morphological entries that are the result of subsequent inflectional processes on morphological entries.}} \newglossaryentry{gfp}{name={A valid morphological entry set}, description={% A valid morphological entry set is a morphological entry set subject to the condition that any lexeme-form pair must be unique.}} \newglossaryentry{lmp}{name={form paradigm}, description={% A lexeme's morphological paradigm are the morphological entries that share a lexeme.}} \newglossaryentry{lsp}{name={entry paradigm}, description={% A lexeme's syntactic paradigm are all the lexical entries that are the output of any proto-lexical mapping functions that take the lexeme's morphological paradigm entries as input.}} \newglossaryentry{mentry}{name={morphological entry}, plural={morphological entries}, description={% A morphological entry is a triple of a morphological state, lexeme and form.}} \newglossaryentry{lentry}{name={lexical entry}, plural={lexical entries}, description={...}} \newglossaryentry{mpheno}{name={morpho-pheno}, description={...}} \newglossaryentry{basee}{name={basic entry}, description={% A basic entry is a form paradigm entry that is not the result of an inflectional process.}} \newglossaryentry{stemm}{name={stem}, description={% A form belonging to a morphological paradigm entry to which some inflectional process applies is a stem.}} \newglossaryentry{basef}{name={basic form}, description={% A form belonging to a basic entry. If it is also a stem, it is a basic stem.}} \newglossaryentry{bases}{name={basic stem}, description={% A basic form that is also a stem.}} \newglossaryentry{free}{name={free stem}, description={% A form which is also a morphological word is called a free stem.}} \newglossaryentry{bound}{name={bound stem}, description={% A stem which is not also a morphological word is called a bound stem.}} \newglossaryentry{mword}{name={morphological word}, description={% A form which is directly related to the pheno of some lexical entry is a morphological word.}} %%% Local Variables: %%% mode: latex %%% TeX-master: "../main" %%% End: