added some definitions about forms and the new name for the theory
This commit is contained in:
parent
b281308d43
commit
136139f27c
29
glossary.tex
29
glossary.tex
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
||||||
\newabbreviation{lcg}{LCG}{Linear Categorial Grammar}
|
\newabbreviation{lcg}{LCG}{Linear Categorial Grammar}
|
||||||
\newabbreviation{coc}{CC}{Calculus of Inductive Constructions}
|
\newabbreviation{coc}{CC}{Calculus of Inductive Constructions}
|
||||||
\newabbreviation{hol}{HOL}{Higher Order Logic}
|
\newabbreviation{hol}{HOL}{Higher Order Logic}
|
||||||
\newabbreviation{stc}{MWXM}{MWXM}
|
\newabbreviation{stc}{FFM}{Form First Morphology}
|
||||||
\newabbreviation{ibm}{IBM}{Information-Based Morphology}
|
\newabbreviation{ibm}{IBM}{Information-Based Morphology}
|
||||||
\newabbreviation{pfm}{PFM}{Paradigm Function Morphology}
|
\newabbreviation{pfm}{PFM}{Paradigm Function Morphology}
|
||||||
\newabbreviation{plt}{PLT}{Paradigm Linking Theory}
|
\newabbreviation{plt}{PLT}{Paradigm Linking Theory}
|
||||||
|
@ -15,6 +15,33 @@
|
||||||
\newabbreviation{hpsg}{HPSG}{Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar}
|
\newabbreviation{hpsg}{HPSG}{Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar}
|
||||||
\newabbreviation{hsm}{HSM}{hierarchical finite-state machine}
|
\newabbreviation{hsm}{HSM}{hierarchical finite-state machine}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\newglossaryentry{morph}{name={morph}, description={%
|
||||||
|
A morph could be thought of as the form component of a morpheme
|
||||||
|
without a sememe or meaning. It is not an exponent because it does
|
||||||
|
not realize a meaning. It is a unit of phonology that within the
|
||||||
|
context of a word-form contributes to the interpretation of the
|
||||||
|
word-form's possible meanings. }}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\newglossaryentry{form}{name={form}, description={%
|
||||||
|
A form is essentially a phonological form. More precisely, here it
|
||||||
|
is an abstraction with an interpretation within an unknown theory
|
||||||
|
of phonology. For instance, if `a' is a symbol used in a form,
|
||||||
|
this may be interpreted as a phoneme. It may be the case that
|
||||||
|
morphophonology is captured in the notation such that `s' could be
|
||||||
|
used for the English plural/genitive/third person morph, which is
|
||||||
|
predictably [s], [z] or [ɪz]. This theory is non-committal as to
|
||||||
|
the ontological status of what these symbols represent but one
|
||||||
|
should refer to \citet{hockett1954two}, where these are seen as
|
||||||
|
notations for the purposes of concise description, rather than
|
||||||
|
notations for underlying forms in a mental grammar. In particular,
|
||||||
|
these should not be seen as an endorsement of the underlying form
|
||||||
|
concept. }}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\newglossaryentry{wordform}{name={word-form}, description={%
|
||||||
|
A word-form is a form that corresponds to a freely occurring
|
||||||
|
syntactic element. Note that this remains an informal descriptive
|
||||||
|
term. }}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\newglossaryentry{allomorphy}{name={allomorphy}, description={%
|
\newglossaryentry{allomorphy}{name={allomorphy}, description={%
|
||||||
The general term given to the phenomenon where two lexemes are in
|
The general term given to the phenomenon where two lexemes are in
|
||||||
overlapping syntactic distributions but exhibit complementary
|
overlapping syntactic distributions but exhibit complementary
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue